When extending integration techniques to higher dimensions, traditional methods face significant challenges:
Example: In a 10-dimensional space, even a modest $N = 10$ per dimension results in $10^{10}$ total sample points, demonstrating the impracticality of traditional grid-based sampling in high dimensions.
This sets the stage for exploring Monte Carlo methods, which offer a viable solution to these multidimensional challenges.
We can see that for large dimensions the scaling is quite poor with traditional integration methods
We can abandon the requirement of sampling along a fixed size grid and sample points randomly.
Monte Carlo integration offers a powerful solution for high-dimensional integrals:
The integral of a function $f(x)$ over a domain $\Omega$ is approximated as:
$$ \int_\Omega f(x) \;dx \approx \frac{V}{N} \sum\limits_{i=1}^N f(r_i) $$where,
Example: Estimating the area under a curve in a unit square by averaging the function values at random points within the square.
This approach bypasses the curse of dimensionality faced by grid-based sampling methods.
Exploring convergence through a specific function:
Consider the function $f(x) = \prod_i x_i$, which is the product of variables over dimensions.
Integrating over a unit cube in $D$ dimensions:
$$ I_D = \int_0^1 dx_1 \dots \int_0^1 dx_D\; x_1 \dots x_D = 2^{-D} $$This integration helps illustrate how Monte Carlo methods perform in multidimensional spaces.
Now, let's plot the error as a function of dimensionality:
$$ E(D) = \left| 2^D I_D -1 \right|$$The error scales as $1/\sqrt{N_{total}}$ regardless of the dimension!
For high dimensions this is going to be better than regular sampling!